“in alten Fahrwassern”

Posted on by Herbert Hrachovec Leave a comment

IMG_0306

Andreas Kirchner schreibt im vorigen Beitrag über die Geschichtspflege in der Philosophie. Zeitgleich ist die letzte Ausgabe von Information Philosophie erschienen, in der Konrad Liessmann den Hauptessay beisteuert. Die “Information Philosophie” ist (sympathischer Weise) so unzeitgemäß, dass sie (im Moment) noch nicht einmal das Inhaltsverzeichnis am Netz hat. Der Titel des Aufsatzes sei verraten: “Vom Nutzen und Nachteil des Denkens für das Leben”. Und er beginnt, wie zu erwarten, mit Nietzsche und der Unzeitgemäßheit der Philosophie.

Ich verrate auch die Pointe des Essays. Die Philosophie möge sich darauf besinnen:

… dass eine ihrer wesentlichen Aufgaben nicht darin besteht, die Menschen glücklich zu machen oder mit Sinn auszustatten, sondern sie – wenigstens hin und wieder – zu betrüben.”

Eine bemerkenswert klarsichtige Beschreibung der Rolle der Philosophie im Feuilleton. Dazu ein Aufwand von Nietzsche zu Goethe zu Epiktet zu Vico zu Hegel zu Dilthey zu Hugo von Hofmannsthal. Eine vielgestaltige Schlauchverbindung. Andreas: “Alte Schläuche können brechen – beim neuen Wein. Es ist keine Notwendigkeit, dass das Überlieferte Entscheidungen in der aktuellen Lage vorwegnimmt.”

Read more

A Fusion of Horizons?

Posted on by Herbert Hrachovec 1 Comment

Andreas Kirchner proposes some guidlines concerning the hermeneutic problems raised by Alain Badiou’s philosophical procedures. He has a suggestive way to describe what a (supposed) inconsistency found in a given text does: it triggers a plan B on part of the reader who supposedly wanted to “consume” the text “as is”. Now, there can be a great number of reactions to being faced with (partial) incomprehensibility. One can be confused, angry or overwhelmed. Hermeneutics is a plan B inasmuch it is a rule-governed enterprise, following an established methodology. One of its main rules is the “principle of charity” we have been discussing as applied to Badiou.

I want to make two points: (1) on the charitable view of Badiou’s use of mathematics and (2) on Gadamer’s “fusion of horizons” as an additional hermeneutical principle.

Read more

The Matheme of the Event

Posted on by Andreas Kirchner 4 Comments

I am a fan of the (probably hermeneutic) idea that if one aims to write an adequate critics/response of a text, one needs to initially assume that the text, this crude and crazy production of thought – is actually adequate. Let’s undertake this apparently naive experiment, that everything written in the text in front of us is correct and if we work hard enough we can make sense out of it. The question then is to observ, pronounce and – if possible – overcome the resistances that our understanding produces when we read the text. With such an assumption we get the chance to describe arguments in the text in a way that makes it more accessible to others (who may have made similar reading-experiences). But secondly – I am convinced – it is one way to better locate flaws, when we at the same time keep in mind that this is an experiment – and that our initial assumption can arguable turn out to be wrong.

The following – very limited – examination deals with one aspect of “Being and Event” (BE), a major work of Alain Badiou, namely the “Matheme of the Event”. Badiou uses a set-theoretical framework in order to analyze how it is possible that a situation – shaped by structures, rules, habits, stabilized knowledge – gets disturbed such that novelties – new perspectives – emerge that were not thinkable within the situation before. The flash that disturbs the situation is called the event.

The context and motivation of this post are (1) recent, unsatisfying critiques and repliques about the status of mathematics in BE – published in Critical Inquiry and (2) the collection of Badiou-related postings in this blog:

Read more